Wednesday, November 27, 2019

AMX Resources essays

AMX Resources essays ID Love ( Director, Non-executive Dir. ) MJ Palmer ( Chairman, Director, Non-executive Dir. ) With the $30,000 I had to invest I bought 37980 shares in the company at $0.79. Then I waited and hoped that they would go up. When the shares reached the price of $1.24 I sold them. One reason for this was that on observing the stock exchange and some of the stocks that rise rapidly is that after a while the stocks drop because everybody wants to sell them before other people do and the price drops. The day after I sold the shares in AMX Resources the price dropped $0.14 to $1.10. After that it dropped steadily to $0.98. When it reached this point I thought I might buy them again but I didn ¡t and the price didn ¡t rise until after our trading time had finished. h Will Becker gave me a tip. (A big reason as I don ¡t have much idea on the stock exchange) h I looked into the company and there was a bit of movement going on and so I thought it might go up. h I didn ¡t have anything else to invest in. h It was a mining share and so prone to extremely big changes. AMX Resources is a company mainly involved in the gold exploration sector. The company has been around for a while and so I thought it would be a good buy. Another thing I looked at whilst looking for a share to buy was the year high and the year low. I suppose in a way I was lucky that someone in our group was pretty involved in the stock exchange. I was also lucky that the stock went up and didn ¡t crash. There is not much control over the stock market and so any money that is won is either a lot of good luck or a bit and some good management. With this share I started with $30,000. ...

Saturday, November 23, 2019

Hitler and Roosevelt essays

Hitler and Roosevelt essays Franklin D. Roosevelt and Adolf Hitler were both very powerful men, yet at the same time they were from two different worlds and two completely different men. The one thing they did have in common was that they were the leaders of their country. Although Hilter was a sadistic dictator who almost took out a human race, while Roosevelt was a good man and an even better president. The two men are extremely different and have very different views. Adolf Hitler was born in Austria on April 20, 1889 into a poor family. He had an illegitimate father who was very poor. Roosevelt was born into a wealthy family on January 30, 1882 at Hyde Park, New York. Hitler grew up in Linz, Austria and received secondary schooling and although bad in school, left at the age of 16. He wanted to become an art student and attend the Academy of Fine Arts, but failed to get in. Roosevelt on the other hand was very good in school, he attended Harvard University and Columbia Law School. Hitler made a living by painting postcards and advertisements while moving from one boarding house to another. He also led a very lonely life, with no friends or lady friends. Roosevelt was very successful, he won the senate in 1910; was appointed Assistant Secretary of the Navy, and he was the Democratic nominee for vice president in 1920; not only was he successful in his career but his love life was doing well, he married Eleanor on St. Patricks Day in 1905. Hitler showed signs of his later behavior in his earlier years, he was very distant from people, hated non-Germans and of course the Jewish people, he was lonely and bitter, and ready to live in a world of fantasy to escape his failures and his poverty. Roosevelt on the other hand was a positive man with great determination, even when was struck with polio he worked hard to get stronger. The two men are very different in many aspects. Hitler left the army to join the Nazi party and went against many of the offici...

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Strategic Management and Transport Policy Critical Review Assignment

Strategic Management and Transport Policy Critical Review - Assignment Example The critical review aims at analysing sustainable transport and the modernisation of urban transport in cities. The paper makes use of research conducted by Thynell, Mohan, and Tiwari that investigates and provides results and conclusions on the transport sustainability and modernisation in Delhi and Stockholm. The paper will critically review this study as a basis to get conclusive evidence on areas that the study was effective and the not so effective areas that the researchers ought to have made improvements. The topic comes from the journal, Cities, Volume 27 published in 2010 titled, â€Å"Sustainable transport and the modernization of urban transport in Delhi and Stockholm†. The essay will make a summary of the main areas of the article with specific emphasis on the discussion, methods, results, and conclusions, provide a summary of three articles in the field inclusive of the article under review on the field, and provide value judgments on the article. The essay will n ot be in a position to provide a comprehensive view of the whole transport literature because of the limited time and length of the paper. The essays course is the provision of a view on the effective strategies that were applied or ought to have been applied in the completion of the transport article to ensure more success and provide a view of the literature on transport. The need for an efficient transport system has never been greater in cities with the growth of the economy and the modernisation of lifestyles. The effect was pressure for cities to invest in modern technology and ensure its sustainability as a measure of managing traffic and augment competitiveness in national and international context. The purpose of the article was to find politicians perceptions and examine the transport plans in Delhi and Stockholm in a view of finding the driving forces for infrastructure plans and transport policy.